Premise 1: Creation Reveals An Eternally Powerful God

First Cause
/ˌfərs(t) ˈkôz/
the beginning to which every chain of causes must ultimately go back.

The Law of Causation involves 3 simple steps:
  1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause of its beginning
  2. The universe began to exist
  3. Therefore the universe must have a cause of its beginning

According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Yet atheists and evolutionists claim that the universe began 13–14 billion years ago with the explosion of a dense ball of matter. However, they offer no reasonable explanation for how that original matter came into existence in the first place.

The classical philosophical principle Ex nihilo nihil fit—“out of nothing, nothing comes”—underscores this point. It is not only a foundational tenet of rational thought but also central to the law of causation. The gases, matter, and chemicals that naturalistic theories assume were present at the beginning must themselves have had a cause—they could not have come from nothing.

The Origin of The Original Matter in the Big Bang Cannot Be Naturally Explained

If you ChatGPT “Big Bang Singularity” it will provide this explanation:

The singularity in the context of the Big Bang theory refers to a hypothetical
point at the very beginning of the universe, when all matter, energy, space,
and time were compressed into an infinitely dense and hot state.

The Theory of Evolution stands as a counter-argument to Creationism largely because naturalists, by definition, insist that science must be limited to purely natural explanations. They maintain that the universe is a closed system in which no supernatural entity can intervene. From the naturalist perspective, every event—past, present, and future—must have a natural cause—except for when it comes to the matter, energy, and chemicals that supposedly super-heated, and exploded into the Big Bang.

meth·od·o·log·i·cal nat·u·ral·ism
/ˌmeTHədəˈläjək(ə)l/ /ˈnaCH(ə)rəˌliz(ə)m/

According to methodological naturalism, science must restrict itself
solely to blind natural causes and unbroken laws of nature.

However, when it comes to the origins of the universe, evolutionary theory presents a philosophical inconsistency. In order to uphold their worldview, evolutionists must either believe that matter, energy, and the chemical ingredients that led to the Big Bang somehow created themselves out of nothing, or they must assume these elements have existed eternally—both of which contradict the foundational naturalist principle of requiring observable, testable, and natural explanations.

The evidence from nature is that matter and energy could not create themselves (First Law of Thermodynamics), nor could it exist forever (Second Law of Thermodynamics). Here are the first two Laws of Thermodynamics in concise terms:

  1. First Law (Law of Energy Conservation): Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.
  2. Second Law (Law of Entropy): In any energy transfer or transformation, the total entropy (disorder) of a closed system will increase over time to a state where no useful energy remains to do work.

Science, and common logic agree that matter cannot emerge from nothing, and it cannot be eternal.

Scientists have increasingly realized the universe must have had a beginning because everything we can observe—space, time, and matter—is expanding, cooling, and running down, which points to a starting point in the past. When you “rewind” the universe’s expansion (like running a movie backward), everything converges to a single beginning, not an eternal past.

Two simple reasons:

  1. The universe is expanding — which implies it was once tightly packed into a starting point.
  2. Energy is running down (Second Law of Thermodynamics) — an eternal universe would have run out of usable energy long ago.

So the logic is:
If the universe is expanding and its energy is fading, it cannot be eternal. It had to start.

Evolutionist have to believe without the ability to substantiate—that the matter, energy, and chemicals that caused the Big Bang are eternal, and that a random, mindless interaction between them caused all of the biological and mathematical complexity we readily see in the universe. In order for any theory to qualify as as scientific it must be supported by observations that are repeatedly observable.

What Science And Reason Eliminate

  1. Matter cannot cause itself
    • Self-creation is a logical contradiction (it would have to exist before it exists).
  2. Matter cannot be eternal
    • The Second Law of Thermodynamics points to a universe running down from an initial state of high order, implying a beginning.
  3. The universe had a beginning
    • Confirmed by Big Bang cosmology and models of cosmic expansion.
The Biblical Explanation of Origins Does Not Violate the Laws of Physics or The Law Of Causation

In the Beginning God created the heavens and the earth

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End

Genesis 1:1, Revelation 22:13

An increasing number of scientists (dissentfromdarwin.org) are acknowledging that the Theory of Evolution may need to be either significantly revised or replaced altogether due to its dependence on several unobservable and untestable assumptions. These assumptions include the idea that matter is eternal, that life spontaneously emerged from non-living matter, and that complex information arose randomly from a non-intelligent source. None of these phenomena are scientifically observable, repeatable, or testable, which challenges the theory’s standing as a fully scientific explanation.

For any theory to qualify as scientific, it must be supported by observations that are repeatable and testable. Neither creation nor evolution fully meets this criterion. No human being observed the origin of the universe or the origin of life—these events occurred in the unobservable past and cannot be repeated in the present.

As such, both creation and evolution are interpretive frameworks based on circumstantial evidence rather than direct observation. Therefore, they should be evaluated not solely by scientific method, but by which worldview best explains philosophical, observable, and scientific reality. In philosophy this approach is called the “inference to the best explanation”.

That’s the philosophical method of comparing competing worldviews or theories—not by direct observation, but by asking which one best explains all the data (scientific, philosophical, and experiential) in the most coherent, comprehensive way.

Christians have long believed that the creation of the universe was a supernatural, historical event, as described in the opening chapter of Genesis. According to Scripture, the origin of the universe, Earth, life, and the laws of physics was not a natural process but a miraculous act of God—an event that lies outside the scope of empirical science.

In contrast, proponents of evolution cannot provide definitive scientific answers to foundational questions such as:

  • Where did the matter, energy, and chemicals come from that caused the Big Bang?
  • How can life emerge from non-living matter?
  • How can the mathematical laws of physics and the information encoded in DNA arise from blind, natural forces?
The Existence of God Offers the Most Coherent Explanation As First Cause of the Universe

The Law of Causality states that everything that begins to exist must have a cause. Since the universe had a beginning (as supported by the Big Bang theory and the Second Law of Thermodynamics), it must have had a cause outside of itself. That cause must be:

  • Eternal (not caused)
  • Immaterial (not made of matter)
  • Powerful (to create the universe)
  • Intelligent (to account for design and order)

Only God, as described in the biblical worldview, fits this description. He is the uncaused, necessary being who exists outside of time, space, and matter—exactly what the evidence demands.

God Explains the Origin of Information

DNA contains vast amounts of functionally specified, complex information, much like a language or a computer code. Modern science has confirmed that:

  • Information, especially of this kind, always originates from an intelligent source
  • Random processes do not produce meaningful, goal-directed sequences

The presence of such information in every living cell points not to chance or unguided natural processes, but to an intelligent mind—a Creator who encoded purpose and design into life from the beginning.

God Accounts for the Laws of Physics and Mathematics

The universe operates with precise, unchanging mathematical laws—from gravity to electromagnetism to quantum mechanics. These laws are:

  • Universal
  • Abstract
  • Unchanging
  • Knowable

Atheism and materialism cannot explain why these laws exist or why they are so finely tuned to allow life. In contrast, the belief in a rational, consistent God explains why the universe behaves in a rational, consistent way. As physicist Paul Davies notes, “Science can proceed only if the universe is governed by dependable laws, but science itself cannot explain where those laws come from.”

God Provides a Rational Basis for Life’s Origin

The spontaneous emergence of life from non-living matter (abiogenesis) has never been observed and lacks any naturalistic mechanism. Even the simplest cell is incredibly complex, requiring:

  • Functional proteins
  • Genetic information
  • Self-replication
  • Energy regulation

Naturalistic theories have no satisfying explanation for how such interdependent systems could arise by chance. The biblical God, however, is described as the Giver of life (Acts 17:25) and as forming life intentionally and purposefully (Genesis 2:7).

God Best Explains the Unity and Diversity of Creation

The observable world is full of both unity (shared genetic code, consistent physical laws) and diversity (millions of unique species, individual consciousness, moral awareness). The biblical worldview explains this balance:

  • Unity reflects a single Creator and Designer
  • Diversity reflects His creativity and intentionality

Other worldviews tend to overemphasize one or the other (e.g., pantheism emphasizes unity to the neglect of individuality; materialism sees only diversity with no unifying purpose).

Conclusion

The belief in God as the supernatural Creator:

  • Best fits the origin of the universe
  • Makes sense of the fine-tuned laws of nature
  • Explains the presence of information and design in life
  • Grounds objective morality, human value, and purpose

Far from being anti-scientific, this belief provides the necessary foundation for science, reason, and meaning itself. It’s not a gap-filler, but a worldview that makes sense of all the data—philosophically, scientifically, and experientially.

The author of Genesis makes it abundantly plain that God who exists outside of nature created the Universe and that the origin of the universe and biological life can only be described and partially explained. Paradoxically, this is exactly what modern science is pointing to and not away from.

Challenge Question: If science and nature have proven that it is irrational to say that matter caused, created itself, or is eternal—Does the Bible’s explanation that God is the eternal uncaused cause provide the explanation that best fits philosophical reasoning and the observable facts of reality?

Premise 2: Creation Reveals An Infinitely Intelligent God

The heavens tell of the glory of God. The skies display his marvelous craftsmanship.
Day after day they continue to speak; night after night they make Him known.
They speak without a sound or a word’ their voice is silent in the skies;
Yet their message has gone out to all the earth, and their words to all the world

Psalm 19:1-4

The word “tell” in the original Hebrew is saphar, meaning “to recount” or “to assign.” The Psalmist is unequivocally declaring that the complexity, diversity, creativity, intelligence, and power displayed in nature assign authorship of creation to God. Day after day and night after night, the intricate design and fine-tuning of the universe—including the laws of physics and the vast genetic biodiversity—vividly showcase the craftsmanship and intelligence of a Creator God.


Genetic Diversity And DNA Complexity Cannot Be The Result of Random Processes

In 1953 James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the double-helix structure of DNA. In 1957  Crick had an insight which he called “The Sequence Hypothesis,” and it was the idea that along the spine of the DNA molecule there were four chemicals that function just like alphabetic characters in a written language or digital characters in a machine code. That DNA molecule is literally encoding information into alphabetic or digital form.

This discovery was a huge blow to the theory of evolution because science and human experience has demonstrated that this kind of information always comes from an intelligence and cannot occur purposelessly or randomly. Whether you find a message on a sticky note, a primitive cave drawing, or a word written in the sand you will always be able to trace them back to an information source or provider. Information has never been the result of random happenstance.

Information Theory

Meaningful or complex information always comes from an intelligent source

Example of Information Theory:
  • A book contains meaningful sentences in English.
  • We don’t assume the wind or nature made it — we know an author wrote it.
  • So, if DNA looks like a code with instructions, it must also have an author.

Each of the 8.7 million species scientist believe exist has their own distinct DNA blueprint or digitized super codes. The DNA of every organism contains a veritable library of specialized, instructional information to be used in the organism’s formation, growth, and survival.

The DNA in just one of the 37 trillion cells in the human body measures 6 feet long. If you uncoiled all of the strands of human DNA it would equal 67 billion miles or 150,000 round trips to the moon. The information in DNA is more sophisticated than anything else known to man, including the information to assemble nuclear weapons, super computers, and space stations.

DNA is a biological blueprint with far more complex and functional instructions than any other human design or computer program and every blade of grass, spider, tadpole, albatross, kangaroo etc. has it’s own blueprint that is unshared by any other species.

The origin of life requires a massive infusion of purposeful information, which can only be explained by intelligent design. Biological information such as found in DNA and proteins comprise two features that are hallmarks of intentional design and not random processes:

  1. Complexity
  2. Functionality

The 8.7 million species of animals have their own anatomies, habitats, breeding patterns, instincts, and behaviors and none of them crossbreed in nature, and the majority cannot crossbreed within subspecies without sterility or death occurring. Oh, and what about the genetic diversity found in plant species?

There are about 435,000 unique land plant species on Earth with about 2,000 new species being discovered every year each with their own precise, and vastly complex DNA super code blueprints.

The Bible Explains Who the Divine Source of Genetic Diversity Is

Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so.

And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.”  So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind.

And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so.  God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds.

Genesis Chapter 1

In this passage, the word “kinds” appears eight times. The Hebrew term used is “min,” which is commonly understood to mean species or distinct forms. This passage describes the creation of all plants, animals, birds, fish, and mammals as fully formed, each according to their kind—appearing all at once, not through gradual development which is what the fossil record demonstrates.

Evolutionist are being disingenuous when they attribute the eruption of the mass quantity of complex information contained in the universe as being the result of blind and random processes—no information not even the letter “G” has ever been observed to come from a non-intelligent source. The Bible on the other hand explains what modern genetics is proving—that species are genetically specific (the word specific actually comes from the word species) and are cannot be genetic ancestors of each other.

Intelligent Design is the Best explanation for the Complex Information Found in DNA

Genesis was written between 1445 -1405 B.C. but it accurately affirms what James Watson and Francis Crick discovered in 1957 that every organism has its own DNA encoding information in alphabetic or digital form.

The Hebrew word min or species used in Genesis Chapter 1, is where we also get the English word kind or kin from. The book of Genesis ( Hebrew for origin, and root word for Gene) lists every kind of species from plants, fish, birds, animals, and insects and says they were created independently according to their kind specifying classes, genus and species as non-ancestral and genetically distinct.

1. What Is in DNA?

DNA contains:

  • A four-letter digital code (A, T, C, G)
  • Highly specific sequences that determine how proteins are built
  • The instructions for building and maintaining life

This information is not just complex—it is specified and functional, meaning it performs a precise role in a biological system.

2. Why Random Processes Fall Short
  • Random chance cannot reasonably produce large amounts of specified information—the probabilities are astronomically low.
  • Natural selection can preserve advantageous traits, but it cannot create the first functional DNA code without a pre-existing system to copy and interpret it.
  • The origin of life (abiogenesis) requires the spontaneous emergence of a vast, coordinated system of functional information—something we never observe arising from unguided material processes.
3. What We Know About Information
  • In all known cases, high-level functional information (e.g., language, code, blueprints) originates from an intelligent mind.
  • No natural process has ever been observed to generate semantically meaningful and goal-directed information like that found in DNA.

Information theory tells us that:

  • Complexity + Function = Design Indicators
  • Purposeful, encoded information always points to a sender or designer
4. DNA and Intelligent Design

DNA fits the profile of intelligently designed systems:

  • Highly ordered yet not repetitive (non-random complexity)
  • Purpose-driven (builds life)
  • Error-checking and self-replicating systems built in

These characteristics go far beyond what unguided natural processes can plausibly achieve.

The complex and functionally specific information found in DNA and throughout nature cannot be the product of chance or unguided processes. It bears all the hallmarks of purposeful design, pointing unmistakably to an intelligent source behind life and creation. Genesis describes, and genetics, the laws of physics point to an eternal, all-knowing Creator whose purposeful design is evident in the information woven into every single living thing.

Challenge Question: If information theory affirms that usable information can only come from an intelligence source and not randomly then how can the origin of genetic complexity be explained? Does the Genesis account affirm what modern genetics has discovered?

ThinkCube Truth Veracity Grid

  1. Have I considered the facts carefully and with an open mind?
  2. Is my conclusion the result of a careful examination of the facts, or is it a conclusion made in spite of the facts?
  3. Is my conclusion the one that makes the most sense of the evidence?